This is a logistic sigmoid function:

I know x. How can I calculate F(x) in Python now?

Let's say x = 0.458.

F(x) = ?

This should do it:

```
import math
def sigmoid(x):
return 1 / (1 + math.exp(-x))
```

And now you can test it by calling:

```
>>> sigmoid(0.458)
0.61253961344091512
```

**Update**: Note that the above was mainly intended as a straight one-to-one translation of the given expression into Python code. It is *not* tested or known to be a numerically sound implementation. If you know you need a very robust implementation, I'm sure there are others where people have actually given this problem some thought.

It is also available in scipy: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.logistic.html

```
In [1]: from scipy.stats import logistic
In [2]: logistic.cdf(0.458)
Out[2]: 0.61253961344091512
```

which is only a costly wrapper (because it allows you to scale and translate the logistic function) of another scipy function:

```
In [3]: from scipy.special import expit
In [4]: expit(0.458)
Out[4]: 0.61253961344091512
```

**If you are concerned about performances continue reading, otherwise just use expit.**

```
In [5]: def sigmoid(x):
....: return 1 / (1 + math.exp(-x))
....:
In [6]: %timeit -r 1 sigmoid(0.458)
1000000 loops, best of 1: 371 ns per loop
In [7]: %timeit -r 1 logistic.cdf(0.458)
10000 loops, best of 1: 72.2 µs per loop
In [8]: %timeit -r 1 expit(0.458)
100000 loops, best of 1: 2.98 µs per loop
```

As expected `logistic.cdf`

is (much) slower than `expit`

. `expit`

is still slower than the python `sigmoid`

function when called with a single value because it is a universal function written in C ( http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/ufuncs.html ) and thus has a call overhead. This overhead is bigger than the computation speedup of `expit`

given by its compiled nature when called with a single value. But it becomes negligible when it comes to big arrays:

```
In [9]: import numpy as np
In [10]: x = np.random.random(1000000)
In [11]: def sigmoid_array(x):
....: return 1 / (1 + np.exp(-x))
....:
```

(You'll notice the tiny change from `math.exp`

to `np.exp`

(the first one does not support arrays, but is much faster if you have only one value to compute))

```
In [12]: %timeit -r 1 -n 100 sigmoid_array(x)
100 loops, best of 1: 34.3 ms per loop
In [13]: %timeit -r 1 -n 100 expit(x)
100 loops, best of 1: 31 ms per loop
```

But when you really need performance, a common practice is to have a precomputed table of the the sigmoid function that hold in RAM, and trade some precision and memory for some speed (for example: http://radimrehurek.com/2013/09/word2vec-in-python-part-two-optimizing/ )

Also, note that `expit`

implementation is numerically stable since version 0.14.0: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/3385

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution

Not affiliated with: Stack Overflow